The following is one of a wide range of analytical topics covered in NFTRH 293′s 35 pages this week, much of which is straight ahead technical analysis. But the T Bond market is usually central to an overall macro view at any given time. This segment is not meant to provide actionable direction (other than perhaps to prepare for a potential rise in T bonds yields), it is meant to dig into the mechanics beneath the financial markets in an effort to have people consider that there is much more going on with markets than simple nominal TA or conventional fundamental analysis (PE ratios, growth metrics, reported economic data, etc.) can account for.
10 & 30yr yields have declined to support as NFTRH projected
Yields on long-term Treasuries have continued to decline in line with our view that was contrary the 'Great Rotation' (out of bonds) hype. The [30-year] especially is now close to support and the next play seems like it could be rising yields and declining T bonds.
Our long-term 'Continuum' chart; yields approach support
The 30-year 'Continuum' view above makes the simple case that players had to be put offside believing in the 'Great Rotation' at 4% yields. The nearly half-year decline since then has now satisfied the chart as yields have come to our 3.1% to 3.2% target range, where there is support.
It is interesting that stocks have continued to rise despite declining yields, whereas previously they had been rising with yields. One victim of this phenomenon however, has been a stock market leader, the banks. It is no surprise at all that bank leadership broke down as yields broke down because ZIRP provides in essence free money where they borrow (Fed Funds) and higher long-term yields provides the implied profit incentive, where they package this stuff out to public and commercial borrowers.
Moving on, we'll close with the 10yr vs. 2yr yield curve with gold juxtaposed in the background.
It continues to be in the realm of possibility if not probability that the gold community's trials and tribulations of the last 2.5 years has been fully earned as the most vocal boosters of the metal looked like utter geniuses in 2004 through 2007 when gold went up while the curve went down and we might add, gold went nowhere vs. commodities (ref. Gold-CCI on page 21).
That was a time when the fundamentals for gold and the gold stock sector were 'not good' and 'flat out awful', respectively. That is because it was a time of economic expansion, not deceleration.
So tell me now Bueller, does the ongoing 2.5 year precious metals bloodbath make sense given that the economy is working relatively as current policy wants it to? Yes, it does make sense.
There is hype in the financial media about how a flattening curve is bad for stocks and the economy, but this chart puts a lie to that lazy analysis. The analysis claims that the curve is still elevated (nice understatement) and thus there is little to worry about.
A flat yield curve worked well enough in the secular bull into 2000, when the situation began to change and a rising curve attended the bear market out of the tech bubble. A flattening curve also attended the 2003 to 2007 cyclical bull market. In the post-2000 age of 'Inflation onDemand' a sharply rising curve has gone hand in hand with unprecedented upset in global financial markets. Most recently however, the curve has dropped in accordance with economic recovery (ref: Operation Twist, which helped kick things off as it pressured short-term yields upward while pressuring long-term yields downward).
Again, much like with the Gold-CCI chart on page 21, if this big picture view breaks down so too must the analysis change to allow for its implications, which would be that a new era of prosperity has been created out of monetary policy. The thing is though, they have not broken down yet so instead, NFTRH stays the course and marvels at these charts showing just how desperate policy has been in its effort to keep the picture intact.
Dow & T Bill rate, long-term relationship
Closer view of the 3 month T Bill rate pinned to ZERO, 5 years & counting
Biiwii.com | Notes From the Rabbit Hole (NFTRH) | Free eLetter | Twitter
It is only a matter of time before the stock market plunges by 50% or more, according to several reputable experts.
“We have no right to be surprised by a severe and imminent stock market crash,” explains Mark Spitznagel, a hedge fund manager who is notorious for his hugely profitable billion-dollar bet on the 2008 crisis. “In fact, we must absolutely expect it."
Unfortunately Spitznagel isn’t alone.
“We are in a gigantic financial asset bubble,” warns Swiss adviser and fund manager Marc Faber. “It could burst any day.”
Faber doesn’t hesitate to put the blame squarely on President Obama’s big government policies and the Federal Reserve’s risky low-rate policies, which, he says, “penalize the income earners, the savers who save, your parents — why should your parents be forced to speculate in stocks and in real estate and everything under the sun?”
Billion-dollar investor Warren Buffett is rumored to be preparing for a crash as well. The “Warren Buffett Indicator,” also known as the “Total-Market-Cap to GDP Ratio,” is breaching sell-alert status and a collapse may happen at any moment.
The vxx; the vxx; the vxx I'm just waiting for the opportune time to jump in.Trust me its coming.
The article is insightful but the content is complex. It would be best if you could state your conclusion simply and dramatically, otherwise it is just entertainment !!
Well, I didn't think I was dumb!
But you sure confused me!
I hope for your sake, it is that I am dumb!
regards
John
I think you guys are terrific. I appreciate your analyses and charts.
A new era of prosperity has been created out of monetary policy?
Perhaps that's the case for the relatively well-off who can benefit disproportionately from the equity markets. Last I checked though, the equity market isn't the economy, which is either stumbling along below trend or actually contracting, as it did in the first quarter. Moreover, if the consumer is 2/3 of the economy and appears to be struggling (look at retail stock weakness and the rise in HELOCS as a clue to how tapped out the consumer is), I'm not sure that bodes well for next quarter either.