![\"Adam](\"\/\/www.ino.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/11\/AdamFeik_Contributor_ImageBadge350.png\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
I\u2019ll give you 6 ideas in this article<\/u>. <\/p>\n
I track over 100 energy investments in my MarketClub portfolio. My list includes drillers, refiners, shippers, coal, solar, MLPs, and pretty much every other corner of the sector. Today, out of 100+ candidates, only 6 are registering a green Trade Triangle signal for both the long-term and intermediate-term trend. (Green Triangles are a sign of a trend that remains intact and invest-able, although the Triangle system does not purport to capture the exact high or exact low point of any trend). <\/p>\n
The first two \u2013 and this deserves a groan, I admit \u2013 are \"short\" oil funds. I\u2019m not telling you anything you don\u2019t already know to say that oil prices have been plummeting since this summer. As a result, short funds are among the few energy-related investments that have performed well lately... and extremely well, at that. \"Short\" funds, of course, profit when a market declines, so if you want to bet that oil prices will continue to fall, DDG and DUG continue to display all green Trade Triangles. \u2028<\/p>\n
DDG is the ProShares Short Oil & Gas fund, which is designed to deliver one-to-one inverse performance (-1x) compared to oil prices. For a slightly higher-octane version of the same strategy, use DUG, which is the ProShares Ultra-Short Oil & Gas fund. DUG is sold as a -2x, or two-to-one inverse fund. Be advised, both DDG and DUG can be highly volatile, and much of the \"easy money\" has likely already been made! So keep a sharp eye on either of these investments and\/or use tight stop-loss orders.<\/p>\n
The next two \"in-favor\" energy investments are related to uranium. Hence, the title of this article to \"go nuclear.\" Last week, INO.com posted a fantastic interview of Casey Research\u2019s Marin Katusa, author of the new book, The Colder War. In the interview, Katusa touted Uranium Energy Corporation (UEC), which happens to be one of the few energy investments with green Trade Triangles right now. See the interview for some of Katusa\u2019s interesting observations and insights about the company. Caution: Katusa advised being highly selective in the uranium category, and indeed, out of a dozen or so uranium companies on my watchlist, UEC is the only pure uranium play that\u2019s working right now. The second uranium-related investment is not a pure play, but rather a fund that invests mostly utility companies involved in nuclear power generation. The fund is the Market Vectors Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR). The fund\u2019s sponsor says the fund\u2019s objective is essentially (paraphrasing) to invest in companies whose long-term strategy is to either derive 50% of their business from uranium or to be substantially involved in nuclear power. Only 2.4% of the fund is invested in companies considered to be part of the energy sector, while over 70% of the fund operates within the utilities sector. While not a pure energy play, NLR does aim to profit from nuclear power, and right now the strategy is working (as evidenced by recent performance).<\/p>\n
The other two investments that appear to be working are Enbridge Energy Partners (EEP) and Tesoro (TSO), both of which have somehow managed to buck the powerful downtrend thus far. EEP is in the oil & gas pipelines business. TSO is a refiner. Both are outperforming virtually all their peers since the oil crash began on June 20th. Interestingly, while I do consider both EEP and TSO to be very good companies, I can\u2019t identify a specific reason why they deserve to be holding up as well as they are! Many of their competitors are very solid companies as well, and will likely present good buying opportunities at some point. Right now though, something about EEP and TSO is simply working. Trust the Triangles. Or in other words, trust the market. The market knows best, and stock price movements are often the best available information about which companies deserve your investment dollars. \u2028<\/p>\n
As Adam Hewison says, \"Always invest with the trend.\" The trend has been with DDG and DUG, undeniably. The other 4 investments also remain in positive trends right now, even despite the carnage all around them. If you choose to invest, know your target and exit strategy in advance (as always), and be sure to follow through on the strategy you set forth in order to protect against losses when the trend changes. <\/p>\n
My advice for intermediate- or long-term investors? Be patient. Greater opportunities are likely to emerge, in my view, as a result of the extreme volatility we\u2019ve seen lately. The INO team and I will, of course, be looking to highlight those opportunities each week \u2013 including any trend reversal that may materialize. We\u2019d all like to \"buy low,\" and this recent plunge will eventually create attractive opportunities to do so. Again, let the signals tell you when the risk is low enough to enter. <\/p>\n
In my article next week<\/u>, I\u2019ll discuss some of the operative fundamental forces that will drive energy trends into 2015. Until then, I wonder how strong the tax-loss selling headwind will prove to be with energy investments. Will the pressure be powerful enough to prevent any rebound until after the 1st of the year? I must say, it\u2019s not an argument I\u2019m spending much time agonizing over, since almost all energy investments are showing red Trade Triangles right now anyway. The trend is generally not with energy investing yet, other than the 6 investments highlighted herein. In the long-run though, don\u2019t be fooled by the plethora of media reports declaring the \"death of the energy super-cycle.\" Rumors about that death, like Mark Twain\u2019s, are greatly exaggerated. All we need is for everyone to believe it\u2019s over. Then I\u2019m confident we\u2019ll see Trade Triangles \u2013 and your brokerage account \u2013 turn green again.<\/p>\n
Thank you, <\/p>\n